Back to course

Understanding Pilot Aptitude Tests

Analogies

Verbal Reasoning & Language · Lesson 2 of 5•2 min read•1 exercise

An analogy asks you to complete 'A is to B as C is to ?': fish is to water as bird is to air. You identify the relationship in the first pair and find the term — or, in the harder version, the pair of terms — that reproduces that exact relationship in the second. Only one option preserves the logic precisely; the rest are plausible near-relations designed to tempt a loose reading.

Why airlines test it

Analogies measure how precisely you grasp relationships and how well you map a known relationship onto a new situation — the cognitive core of learning by comparison. They also probe language comprehension and vocabulary, which matters directly for an international pilot: aviation is conducted in English, and misreading a word or a relationship can have consequences. Selection boards use them as a compact test of verbal precision and flexible thinking.

In the cockpit

Pilots learn enormous amounts by analogy — 'this aircraft's system behaves like the one you trained on, except…' — and reasoning from a familiar case to a new one is how experience transfers. Clear relational thinking also underpins communication: understanding precisely what a clearance, a NOTAM or a company procedure means, and how one instruction relates to another, is what keeps a crew coordinated. Ambiguity is dangerous, and analogical reasoning is the habit of pinning relationships down exactly.

For example: you convert onto a new type and the instructor says the pressurisation system 'works like the one on your last aircraft, except the outflow valve is electric rather than pneumatic.' Working out exactly what carries over and what does not — same relationship, one changed term — is an analogy, and getting the mapping precisely right is what stops you from applying an old habit in the one place it no longer fits.

How to practise

The Analogies game below offers a Single-Word version and a harder Word-Combination version, where two terms are blanked at once. Work up to the combination format — it forces you to hold both sides of the relationship in mind at the same time, which is where the real reasoning happens.

What the test looks like

A worked example from each exercise in this lesson, exactly as the test presents it.

Example: which pair completes the analogy?

Work out the relationship on the side that's complete, then find the pair that makes it hold on both sides. This is the two-blank Word Combination version; the Single Word version blanks just one term.

Baker is toasis to Meat.
Bread … Butcher
Meat … Baker
Bread … Baker
Flour … Butcher
Explanation
Each profession is paired with what they provide: a baker provides bread, a butcher provides meat. So the first blank is the baker's product (bread) and the second is the profession that provides meat (butcher). The distractors swap the two sides, repeat a word already given, or pick something merely related (flour).

Practice the relevant tests

Assessment-grade exercises to practice the relevant competences.

Ready to put this into practice?

Create an account to play the real assessment exercises and track your progress through this course.