Back to course

Understanding the Psychological Evaluation

The Competencies: Working With Others

Lesson 5 of 8•4 min read•1 exercise

Behind the conversational tone, most selection psychologists are scoring you against a fixed list of competencies, and the final report is written in that language. The names vary between airlines; the substance barely does. This lesson covers the interpersonal cluster: how you work with, lead and serve other people. The next lesson covers the individual cluster: judgement, pressure and drive. For each competency, expect two sources of evidence: the examples you give in the interview and, where the selection includes one, your observed behaviour in the group exercise or role-play.

Teamwork

A cockpit crew is a safety system, so this competency is examined hardest of all. It splits into three parts. Communication: listening actively, transmitting clearly, checking that your message landed, and staying constructive in disagreement. Sensitivity: reading the non-verbal signals — noticing the group member who has gone quiet, sensing tension before it surfaces, responding to what people need rather than only what they say. Cooperation: contributing actively while being genuinely willing to drop your own idea for a better one, and balancing your share of the airtime. In a group exercise, the candidate who involves the quiet participant and summarises the group's progress scores better than the one who wins every argument.

Leadership

You are being hired, eventually, to command. The psychologist looks for early evidence in three forms. Organising: making sure a group has the information it needs and everyone knows their task. In a group assignment, explicitly checking that everyone's information has been shared is exactly this. Directing: real examples of guiding others — a sports team captained, a project led, new colleagues trained. The interesting question is always what you did when someone did not deliver. They want to hear a constructive confrontation that fixed the problem without wrecking the relationship. Persuasion: how you handle a divided team — building consensus where possible, deciding where necessary, and making the people who were overruled still feel heard. The captain the airline wants is decisive and inclusive at once, switching styles as the situation demands.

Organisational awareness and adaptability

A modern airliner is a flying piece of a much larger system. A delay decision in the cockpit ripples into crew duty limits, maintenance slots, passengers' connections and the airline's costs, and the psychologist probes whether you naturally think in those terms, weighing commercial and operational interests rather than flying in a vacuum. Alongside it sits adaptability: procedures change, rosters change, aircraft and colleagues change, and the profession belongs to people who absorb that without friction. Examples from any complex organisation you have worked in — who depended on your work, whose work you depended on — carry this competency.

Service orientation

Airlines sell an experience, and the crew at the front are its face. Three things are being read: representativeness, the professional appearance, language and manner of someone wearing the company's uniform in public; helpfulness, a natural instinct to solve people's problems rather than deflect them; and an eye for other people's interests, balancing what passengers, crew and company each need, especially when they conflict. If you have worked in hospitality, retail or any service job, those stories are gold here: staying professional with a difficult customer at the end of a long shift is precisely the disposition being assessed.

How to prepare

Go through the clusters above and attach one concrete story from your own life to each: a real situation with your own actions in it, not a statement of values. The final lesson of this course shows how to structure those stories so they land. If you struggle to find an example for a competency, that is worth knowing before the psychologist discovers it with you. To see these behaviours in their cockpit context, work through the CRM Scenarios on the practice page: each evolving flight-deck situation shows how a response lands with the crew and which crew-cooperation principle is in play — exactly the vocabulary of teamwork this cluster is scored in.

What the test looks like

A worked example from each exercise in this lesson, exactly as the test presents it.

Example: one step of a scenario chain

Each scenario unfolds over two or three steps. At every step you choose one response; the reveal shows how each response would land with the crew, and names the CRM principle in play before the situation develops further.

Decision-makingTaxi out

The intersection shortcut

You are the First Officer. Taxiing out with a queue building behind you, the Captain says: "Let's take the intersection departure — saves us ten minutes." Your performance figures were calculated for the full runway length, and nobody has recomputed them.

One step of the chain — how do you respond?

A)Go along with it — the aircraft is light today and the margin is obviously huge.
1/4Very ineffectiveWorst response

The aircraft departs on numbers computed for a runway it isn't using — 'obviously fine' is doing the job the performance calculation exists to do.

B)State the fact and recommend an action: "Our figures are for the full length — happy to take the intersection once we've re-run the numbers, otherwise full length."
4/4Very effectiveBest response

The Captain nods, you re-run the figures in under a minute, and the shortcut is taken on data instead of optimism — concern raised, loop closed, nothing lost.

C)Ask a soft question — "are we okay from the intersection?" — and leave it at his answer.
3/4Effective

A probe is the right opening rung, but a reassuring "we're fine" ends it — the concern was voiced, yet the numbers still never get checked.

D)Say nothing now, but plan to reject the takeoff if the acceleration feels wrong.
2/4Ineffective

The safeguard moves from a calm recomputation at taxi speed to a split-second judgement at a hundred knots — the worst possible place to discover the margin was thin.

CRM principle — Assertive advocacy (PACE)
This step teaches ASSERTIVE ADVOCACY — the PACE model (Probe, Alert, Challenge, Emergency). The strongest response states the fact, names a limit and offers a workable path (B): that is advocacy pitched at the right rung, and it usually ends the problem in one exchange. A probe that accepts reassurance (C) starts the ladder but steps off it; silent monitoring with a rejection plan (D) trades a cheap fix now for an expensive decision at high speed; and quiet compliance (A) is the steep-gradient failure CRM training exists to remove. In the full game the situation then DEVELOPS into the next step, and your report profiles you across the four NOTECHS-style dimensions.

Practice the relevant tests

Assessment-grade exercises to practice the relevant competences.

Ready to put this into practice?

Create an account to play the real assessment exercises and track your progress through this course.